What is going on in Kazakhstan? 

by Laurie Kazan-Allen

 

 

According to the most recently released data on global asbestos trends, in 2011 national asbestos consumption1 was highest in: China (637,735 tonnes), India (321,803 tonnes), Russia (251,427 tonnes), Brazil (185,332 tonnes) and Kazakhstan (155,166 tonnes). Nothing extraordinary about this, is there? Well, yes there is. Let's look closer at the figures for Kazakhstan.

Table 1. Asbestos Consumption
in Kazakhstan, 2001-2011

(tonnes)

2001 214,298
2002 175,584
2003 173,891
2004 288,873
2005 153,050
2006 142,873
2007 108,951
2008 185,625
2009 40,217
2010 -1,371
2011 155,166

As can be seen from Table 1, in the last few years, the annual usage of asbestos in Kazakhstan has experienced dramatic shifts from year to year, seemingly down somewhat on previous levels. Even so, when we carried out a recent study comparing global asbestos trade figures for 2001 and 20102, we found a very high per capita usage in Kazakhstan in 2010: a staggering 3,849 kg per 1000 citizens.

Table 2. Per Capita Asbestos Consumption Data, 2010

Country Consumption Population Per Capita
Consumption
x 1000
tonnes millions kilograms
 
Kazakhstan 64671 16.8 3849
Sri Lanka 41668 21.2 1965
Russia 263765 143.2 1842
Ukraine 59936 45.6 1314
Thailand 87789 69.9 1256
Brazil 154919 194.3 797
Vietnam 69573 89 782
China 605603 1350.4 448
Indonesia 106067 241 440
Malaysia 8962 29 309
India 362904 1259.7 288
Mexico 13712 116.1 118

Comparing consumption figures for Kazakhstan to those from other countries (Table 2) reveals a startling situation: per capita, Kazakhstan used almost twice as much asbestos as Sri Lanka, the second highest per capita user in this table. However, calculating an average consumption figure for the entire period shown in table 1 reveals a far worse situation: an apparent per capita consumption of 9,500 kg per 1000 population in Kazakhstan – nearly 10 tonnes. What does all this mean? Either Kazakhstan is using massive amounts of asbestos or the figures on which these calculations are based are incorrect. As the source of the data is authoritative – the United States Geological Survey and United Nations Trade Data – it seems the discrepancy will remain unexplained for some while longer. In the meantime, it might be a good idea for someone in the Kazakh government to begin an investigation into this dangerous situation.

March 7, 2013

_______

1 Consumption here means apparent consumption – for asbestos producing nations essentially the difference between production and exports, for consuming nations the difference between imports and exports.

2 Production and consumption figures quoted for 2001 were calculated as the averages of those reported for the years 2000, 2001 and 2002; those for 2010 were calculated similarly.

 

 

       Home   |    Site Info   |    Site Map   |    About   |    Top↑